Currently im doing COMM333 (a subject of university of Wollongong) and I have a struggle with my sustained essay which will be dued in 10 days. I have to read an article and apply two business theories to words to  thoroughly explain the problem. Theories i have learned are

Corporate Social Responsibilities and Global Compact

Dynamic of system (System thinking) 

Positioning your studies

Theories of global commerce

Value and Identity 

• https://abcnews.go.com/International/apple-google-microsoft-dell-tesla-named-lawsuit-deaths/story?id=67795965 (the article)
• The marking rubric i attached below
• I think im gonna apply 2 theories: CSR and global compact as well as theories of global commerce. If possible, can you give me a little more detailed instruction.

Transcribed Image Text:

Lch s abc Apple, Google, X CSR and the UI X Site: COMM33 X > Copy of Essay X Platform: Log X COMM331 Ass X https://www.th x COMM331 Ass X + C moodle.uowplatform.edu.au/pluginfile.php/2040733/mod_resource/content/1/Assessment%201%20Sustained%20Writing%20Marking%20Rubric.pdf " ng dng UOW Library resour... ProQuest Ebook Ce... ProQuest Ebook Ce... ProQuest Ebook Ce... business_ethics_pdf... 00048623.2002.107... AIHW 2.2 How much does... W Kantian ethics - Wik... Student Number First Name Family Name Comm331 Assessment 1- Essay Total -0% Business Knowledge CLO 1 30% CLO 2.2 Exceeds Expectations Criteria 100% HD -85% -75% D Analyses a given Topic (theory identification and elaboration) Identifies the significant elements both explicit and implicit in a topic. Collects and uses reference material and data as appropriate (Research extent) Provides examples demonstrating practices, principles or theories (thoery and article alignment justification) Context and purpose of communication Includes considerations of audience, purpose, and the circumstances surrounding the writing task(s) Content Description (depth of theory alignment) Collects a comprehensive collection of reliable and relevant information. Evidence is gathered to devlope a logical argument. Provides original examples demonstrating business knowledge in the discipline of study. Demonstrates an understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and overall elements of the work Uses appropriate, relevant, and content conveying the writer's depth of understanding that shapes the whole work Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a Written Communication Genre and Disciplinary Conventions (Structure wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or 30% CLO 3 Critical Thinking 30% CLO 6 Technology 10% & Format) Sources of Evidence (Referencing) Control of Syntax and Mechanics (Grammar) Explanation of Issues (Article) Evidence (Theories) Influence of context and assumptions (Alignment of article and theory) Students position Conclusions and related outcomes Effective use of technology-facilitated information resources (such as university learning platforms, digital library catalogues/databases and web-browsers) to effectively undertake tasks associated with their studies. writing task(s) including organisation, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices Demonstrates relevant sources o develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing and referenced according to Harvard style Uses English language to skilfully communicate meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. Clearly the issue/problem to be considered and all relevant information necessary for full understanding is provided. Evaluates a range of gathered resources and generates a clear analysis, critiquing viewpoints of experts where relevant. Analyses own and others' assumptions relevant to the context when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are considered. Comprehensively uses the technology-facilitated information resources available to them in a strategic way that ensures exposure to a breadth of information while demonstrating a strong, justified, approach to distinguish reliable sources of information and, via careful selection and use of information to inform the task associated with their studies. Meets Expectations 74% C- -65% -50% P Identifies the significant elements arising explicitly from a topic. Collects some reliable and relevant information Some of the data use to develop a logical argument. Provides established examples demonstrating business knowledge in the field of study Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with relevant audience, purpose, and context). Uses appropriate and relevantcontent to explore/explain ideas within the context of the discipline that shapes the work. Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organisation, content, and presentation Demonstrates an attempt to use relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing and referenced according to Harvard style. Uses English language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors in syntax, word choice and/or mechanics. States clearly the issue/problem to be considered, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. Evaluates some sources and develops a discussion, questioning some viewpoints of experts. Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). Uses most technology-facilitated information resources available and demonstrates ability, in most situations, to distinguish reliable sources of information and apply these to the task associated with their studies. 49% F Below Expectations -25% Unable to identify the significant elements of a topic. Collects few appropriate relevant references. Unable to develop a logical argument due to insufficient or inappropriate data collection Provides no examples that demonstrate business knowledge regarding the topic. Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience). Uses appropriate content to develop some ideas in some parts of the work Evidence of use of basic organisation and presentation conventions Demonstrates little evidence to use sources to support ideas, with little or no attempt to reference according to Harvard style Attempts to write in English but language choices impede meaning due to errors in syntax, word choice and/or mechanics. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. Limited, if any, use of technology-facilitated information resources available to them. Type here to search Effective use of business-relevant software (Excel, PowerPoint, Word or as appropriate to the task) Comprehensive use and/or mastery of business-relevant software to complete tasks to a high standard with products that match or exceed current industry standards. Comments Uses basic business relevant software complete tasks to a good standard and attempts to match the software tool to the tasks or context. Limited, if any, use of business-relevant software or use of software that is not relevant to the task or context. Final Mark 0 | ... >>> ENG 8:04 PM 12/4/2020 6 Lch s abc Apple, Google, X CSR and the UI X Site: COMM33 X > Copy of Essay X Platform: Log X COMM331 Ass X https://www.th x COMM331 Ass X + C moodle.uowplatform.edu.au/pluginfile.php/2040733/mod_resource/content/1/Assessment%201%20Sustained%20Writing%20Marking%20Rubric.pdf " ng dng UOW Library resour... ProQuest Ebook Ce... ProQuest Ebook Ce... ProQuest Ebook Ce... business_ethics_pdf... 00048623.2002.107... AIHW 2.2 How much does... W Kantian ethics - Wik... Student Number First Name Family Name Comm331 Assessment 1- Essay Total -0% Business Knowledge CLO 1 30% CLO 2.2 Exceeds Expectations Criteria 100% HD -85% -75% D Analyses a given Topic (theory identification and elaboration) Identifies the significant elements both explicit and implicit in a topic. Collects and uses reference material and data as appropriate (Research extent) Provides examples demonstrating practices, principles or theories (thoery and article alignment justification) Context and purpose of communication Includes considerations of audience, purpose, and the circumstances surrounding the writing task(s) Content Description (depth of theory alignment) Collects a comprehensive collection of reliable and relevant information. Evidence is gathered to devlope a logical argument. Provides original examples demonstrating business knowledge in the discipline of study. Demonstrates an understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and overall elements of the work Uses appropriate, relevant, and content conveying the writer's depth of understanding that shapes the whole work Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a Written Communication Genre and Disciplinary Conventions (Structure wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or 30% CLO 3 Critical Thinking 30% CLO 6 Technology 10% & Format) Sources of Evidence (Referencing) Control of Syntax and Mechanics (Grammar) Explanation of Issues (Article) Evidence (Theories) Influence of context and assumptions (Alignment of article and theory) Students position Conclusions and related outcomes Effective use of technology-facilitated information resources (such as university learning platforms, digital library catalogues/databases and web-browsers) to effectively undertake tasks associated with their studies. writing task(s) including organisation, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices Demonstrates relevant sources o develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing and referenced according to Harvard style Uses English language to skilfully communicate meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. Clearly the issue/problem to be considered and all relevant information necessary for full understanding is provided. Evaluates a range of gathered resources and generates a clear analysis, critiquing viewpoints of experts where relevant. Analyses own and others' assumptions relevant to the context when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are considered. Comprehensively uses the technology-facilitated information resources available to them in a strategic way that ensures exposure to a breadth of information while demonstrating a strong, justified, approach to distinguish reliable sources of information and, via careful selection and use of information to inform the task associated with their studies. Meets Expectations 74% C- -65% -50% P Identifies the significant elements arising explicitly from a topic. Collects some reliable and relevant information Some of the data use to develop a logical argument. Provides established examples demonstrating business knowledge in the field of study Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with relevant audience, purpose, and context). Uses appropriate and relevantcontent to explore/explain ideas within the context of the discipline that shapes the work. Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organisation, content, and presentation Demonstrates an attempt to use relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing and referenced according to Harvard style. Uses English language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors in syntax, word choice and/or mechanics. States clearly the issue/problem to be considered, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. Evaluates some sources and develops a discussion, questioning some viewpoints of experts. Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others' points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). Uses most technology-facilitated information resources available and demonstrates ability, in most situations, to distinguish reliable sources of information and apply these to the task associated with their studies. 49% F Below Expectations -25% Unable to identify the significant elements of a topic. Collects few appropriate relevant references. Unable to develop a logical argument due to insufficient or inappropriate data collection Provides no examples that demonstrate business knowledge regarding the topic. Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience). Uses appropriate content to develop some ideas in some parts of the work Evidence of use of basic organisation and presentation conventions Demonstrates little evidence to use sources to support ideas, with little or no attempt to reference according to Harvard style Attempts to write in English but language choices impede meaning due to errors in syntax, word choice and/or mechanics. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. Limited, if any, use of technology-facilitated information resources available to them. Type here to search Effective use of business-relevant software (Excel, PowerPoint, Word or as appropriate to the task) Comprehensive use and/or mastery of business-relevant software to complete tasks to a high standard with products that match or exceed current industry standards. Comments Uses basic business relevant software complete tasks to a good standard and attempts to match the software tool to the tasks or context. Limited, if any, use of business-relevant software or use of software that is not relevant to the task or context. Final Mark 0 | ... >>> ENG 8:04 PM 12/4/2020 6