Masters of collaboration By Tom Lester Read the article below and answer the questions Ants, those...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Masters of collaboration By Tom Lester Read the article below and answer the questions Ants, those masters of collaboration, have made their species some of the most successful on the planet. In contrast, tigers walk alone, and are in grave danger of extinction. The message for business is this: in the modern world, we must collaborate or die. Too often, however, in many UK companies, successful collaboration - both internal and external - happens by accident rather than design, contrasting vividly with many overseas rivals. There are good reasons why effective collaboration is growing rapidly. Business operations are becoming steadily more flexible at every level of the organization. Non-core activities are outsourced, and procurement has become a worldwide activity centred on China. Satisfying customers at home demands an unprecedented level of co-operation unimpeded by rigid hierarchies and departmental boundaries. Flatter organizations depend not on authority but on teamwork for effective action, and networks of individuals may stretch halfway round the globe and connect only electronically. The truly multinational executive, able to work effectively anywhere in the world with any nationality, remains a rare beast, and ordinary staff therefore need to understand and learn from different cultures to achieve the right level of collaboration. A foreign joint venture or alliance, for example, may be agreed in Mumbai with great enthusiasm at board level, but the hoped-for results will only materialize if operating staff at all levels in Birmingham are ready and able to work with their opposite numbers. Nationality, religion or corporate culture may be the big hurdle, but it is important to also realize that even within the same organization wider cultural gaps can exist between, say, R&D and finance as between the R&D teams of two partners. Wherever it occurs, the failure to understand can be disastrous. Rover is a tragic example. Back in the 1980s, when shop-floor collaboration in the UK car industry was near zero, Rover nonetheless managed to form a partnership with the Japanese group Honda to fill its vital new model programme. But the arrogance of the Rover managers and the lack of a learning culture prevented them from obtaining the real benefits of the relationship, according to Professor Lord Bhattacharyya, head of the Warwick Manufacturing Group. Later, in 1992, when BMW bought the Rover business, communication with the German managers was even worse (exacerbated by political infighting on the German side). Failure was the inevitable and bitter result. No doubt, ex-Rover patriots today will see the somewhat similar collapse of the DaimlerChrysler link as salve for wounded pride. Rather like Rover, DaimlerChrysler was dogged by poor collaboration and infighting, which stemmed in part from national cultural differences and traditions between German and US managers. Chapter 2 Activities FT Chapter 2 Dimensions of culture in business 44 The outcome in both cases will have come as no surprise to Professor Geert Hofstede, who 30 years ago ploneered the study of cultural diversity in 56 countries using IBM's worldwide database. He has since been joined by others, notably a fellow Dutchman, Fons Trompenaars, and the American Craig Storti. Interest in their work is currently reviving after some big companies, including IBM, found that trying to impose a single corporate culture around the globe did not lead to better collaboration. Two of the five 'cultural dimensions' that Prof Hofstede derived from his database go some way to explaining the difficulties faced by Honda, BMW and Daimler-Benz managers in collaborating with their opposite numbers at Rover and Chrysler respectively. One is individualism, defined as the degree to which ties between individuals family as well as business colleagues - are loose or tight. The UK score as assessed by Prof Hofstede is 89 out of a possible 100, indicating a high degree of individualism, exceeded only by the US with 91. Germany is a little above the European average at 67, but Japan scores 46. On another dimension, uncertainty avoidance - the degree to which individuals feel uncomfortable in unstructured environments - the Japanese score 92, the Germans 65, the Americans 46 and the Brits 35. In real terms, the lack of precise rules and procedures at Longbridge, Rover's main factory, may have made the BMW team uncomfortable from the outset. The cultural guru's great contribution may lie less in detailed analysis of deeply held cultural attitudes and more in helping companies anticipate and understand behaviour patterns that their foreign managers may display in their home territory, and the different patterns that they display when transferred to the UK. As immigration grows, and London expands even further as an international financial centre, it becomes an important skill to be able to work effectively with and through executives of widely different backgrounds. Nationality, however, is not the only cause of non-communication, and not even the main cause, points out Kris Wadia, Accenture's executive partner for global sourcing. 'Put five English-speakers in a room to agree a set of tasks, and each will come away with a slightly different perspective,' he says. Add in personal fiefdoms, ancient IT systems and complex and inappropriate organization and reward structures, and effective collaboration will sink rapidly. Accenture's Mr. Wadia finds that with modern technology, companies can set up the infrastructure and telecommunications links between units relatively easily. What is more difficult and time-consuming are the soft issues, such as training UK managers to work together, and with foreign counterparts, and vice-versa. The more sophisticated the communications systems, the more room there is for misunderstanding. Ants have no such problems. Source: adapted. Questions: for case 1: (Minimum number of words 300 words) total marks (60 Marks) 1. Individualism' and 'Uncertainty Avoidance' are the two dimensions proposed by Hofstede which are mentioned in the text as influential factors in international collaboration. The text gives the 'scores' of the UK, USA, Germany and Japan on these dimensions to illustrate the differences. (30 Marks) a. Look up the scores of these same countries on the remaining cultural dimensions on www.geert-hofstede.com b. How could score differences on these other dimensions also influence collaboration between the four cultures mentioned? Give concrete examples, if possible. Page 3 of 5 Masters of collaboration By Tom Lester Read the article below and answer the questions Ants, those masters of collaboration, have made their species some of the most successful on the planet. In contrast, tigers walk alone, and are in grave danger of extinction. The message for business is this: in the modern world, we must collaborate or die. Too often, however, in many UK companies, successful collaboration - both internal and external - happens by accident rather than design, contrasting vividly with many overseas rivals. There are good reasons why effective collaboration is growing rapidly. Business operations are becoming steadily more flexible at every level of the organization. Non-core activities are outsourced, and procurement has become a worldwide activity centred on China. Satisfying customers at home demands an unprecedented level of co-operation unimpeded by rigid hierarchies and departmental boundaries. Flatter organizations depend not on authority but on teamwork for effective action, and networks of individuals may stretch halfway round the globe and connect only electronically. The truly multinational executive, able to work effectively anywhere in the world with any nationality, remains a rare beast, and ordinary staff therefore need to understand and learn from different cultures to achieve the right level of collaboration. A foreign joint venture or alliance, for example, may be agreed in Mumbai with great enthusiasm at board level, but the hoped-for results will only materialize if operating staff at all levels in Birmingham are ready and able to work with their opposite numbers. Nationality, religion or corporate culture may be the big hurdle, but it is important to also realize that even within the same organization wider cultural gaps can exist between, say, R&D and finance as between the R&D teams of two partners. Wherever it occurs, the failure to understand can be disastrous. Rover is a tragic example. Back in the 1980s, when shop-floor collaboration in the UK car industry was near zero, Rover nonetheless managed to form a partnership with the Japanese group Honda to fill its vital new model programme. But the arrogance of the Rover managers and the lack of a learning culture prevented them from obtaining the real benefits of the relationship, according to Professor Lord Bhattacharyya, head of the Warwick Manufacturing Group. Later, in 1992, when BMW bought the Rover business, communication with the German managers was even worse (exacerbated by political infighting on the German side). Failure was the inevitable and bitter result. No doubt, ex-Rover patriots today will see the somewhat similar collapse of the DaimlerChrysler link as salve for wounded pride. Rather like Rover, DaimlerChrysler was dogged by poor collaboration and infighting, which stemmed in part from national cultural differences and traditions between German and US managers. Chapter 2 Activities FT Chapter 2 Dimensions of culture in business 44 The outcome in both cases will have come as no surprise to Professor Geert Hofstede, who 30 years ago ploneered the study of cultural diversity in 56 countries using IBM's worldwide database. He has since been joined by others, notably a fellow Dutchman, Fons Trompenaars, and the American Craig Storti. Interest in their work is currently reviving after some big companies, including IBM, found that trying to impose a single corporate culture around the globe did not lead to better collaboration. Two of the five 'cultural dimensions' that Prof Hofstede derived from his database go some way to explaining the difficulties faced by Honda, BMW and Daimler-Benz managers in collaborating with their opposite numbers at Rover and Chrysler respectively. One is individualism, defined as the degree to which ties between individuals family as well as business colleagues - are loose or tight. The UK score as assessed by Prof Hofstede is 89 out of a possible 100, indicating a high degree of individualism, exceeded only by the US with 91. Germany is a little above the European average at 67, but Japan scores 46. On another dimension, uncertainty avoidance - the degree to which individuals feel uncomfortable in unstructured environments - the Japanese score 92, the Germans 65, the Americans 46 and the Brits 35. In real terms, the lack of precise rules and procedures at Longbridge, Rover's main factory, may have made the BMW team uncomfortable from the outset. The cultural guru's great contribution may lie less in detailed analysis of deeply held cultural attitudes and more in helping companies anticipate and understand behaviour patterns that their foreign managers may display in their home territory, and the different patterns that they display when transferred to the UK. As immigration grows, and London expands even further as an international financial centre, it becomes an important skill to be able to work effectively with and through executives of widely different backgrounds. Nationality, however, is not the only cause of non-communication, and not even the main cause, points out Kris Wadia, Accenture's executive partner for global sourcing. 'Put five English-speakers in a room to agree a set of tasks, and each will come away with a slightly different perspective,' he says. Add in personal fiefdoms, ancient IT systems and complex and inappropriate organization and reward structures, and effective collaboration will sink rapidly. Accenture's Mr. Wadia finds that with modern technology, companies can set up the infrastructure and telecommunications links between units relatively easily. What is more difficult and time-consuming are the soft issues, such as training UK managers to work together, and with foreign counterparts, and vice-versa. The more sophisticated the communications systems, the more room there is for misunderstanding. Ants have no such problems. Source: adapted. Questions: for case 1: (Minimum number of words 300 words) total marks (60 Marks) 1. Individualism' and 'Uncertainty Avoidance' are the two dimensions proposed by Hofstede which are mentioned in the text as influential factors in international collaboration. The text gives the 'scores' of the UK, USA, Germany and Japan on these dimensions to illustrate the differences. (30 Marks) a. Look up the scores of these same countries on the remaining cultural dimensions on www.geert-hofstede.com b. How could score differences on these other dimensions also influence collaboration between the four cultures mentioned? Give concrete examples, if possible. Page 3 of 5
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
a Here are the scores for the UK USA Germany and Japan on the remaining cultural dimensions according to Hofstedes model MasculinityFemininity UK 66 U... View the full answer
Related Book For
Income Tax Fundamentals 2013
ISBN: 9781285586618
31st Edition
Authors: Gerald E. Whittenburg, Martha Altus Buller, Steven L Gill
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Fields Company has two manufacturing departments, forming and painting. The company uses the weighted average method and it reports the following unit data for the Forming department. Units completed...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Factors that affect the selection of an inventory costing method do not include: (a) tax effects. (b) balance sheet effects. (c) income statement effects. (d) perpetual vs. periodic inventory system.
-
Unpolarized light passes through two polarizers whose transmission axes are at an angle of 30.0 with respect to each other. What fraction of the incident intensity is transmitted through the...
-
Download the sp-500-historical-annual-returns dataset in Excel from Connect or Additional Student Resources.7 Note the annual stock market returns to investment in the S&P 500. Create a visualization...
-
Which of the following is a true statement regard ing the evaluation of an investment center? a. Return on investment may be high because of old equipment that is fully depreciated. b. Residual...
-
Data collected on the yearly demand for 50-pound bags of fertilizer at Wallace Garden Supply are shown in the following table. Develop a 3-year moving average to forecast sales. Then estimate demand...
-
5 Take me to the text Jenson Monitors Lid., a manufacturer of computer monitors, currently produces a 19-inch LCD monitor. The company's accounting department has reported the following annual costs...
-
Max and Annie are roommates sharing an apartment. Although they know each other well, they have respect for each others privacy. Thus, when Maxs Form 1040 was audited by the IRS, he made no mention...
-
Jenny is the director of a company, Shipley Ltd, which is involved in building and construction. There are four other directors of this company. The company has been lending large sums of money to...
-
How do indirect method computations differ from direct method computations?
-
A project has an initial cost of $8,500 and produces cash inflows of $2,700, $4,800, and $1,600 over the next three years, respectively. What is the NPV if the required rate of return is 8%?
-
In net operating income for variances, what happens if my flexible budget is higher than my planning budget? Is it favorable or unfavorable?
-
Gary needs to determine the total costs of his company's tile division and sink division to determine profitability once sales are recognized. The tile division incurs $263,000 in costs, while the...
-
Kellogg Company manufactures cereal and other convenience food under its many well-known brands such as Kellogg's, Keebler, and Cheez-It. The company, with over $13.5 billion in annual sales...
-
Based on this topic, can you cite an existing study that would validate some of the contents or sub-topics enumerated in this video lecture? Be able to: (a) Title of the study (b) Explain or...
-
The Home Depot is the leading retailer in the home improvement industry and one of the 10largest retailers in the United States. The company included the following on its January 29, 2012, balance...
-
Rebecca and Walter Bunge have been married for 5 years. They live at 883 Scrub Brush Street, Apt. 52B, Las Vegas, NV 89125. Rebecca is a homemaker and Walt is a high school teacher. Rebecca's Social...
-
Kent Pham, CPA, is a 45-year-old single taxpayer living at 169 Trendie Street, La Jolla, CA 92037. His Social Security number is 865-68-9635. In 2012, Kent's W-2 as the controller of a local...
-
Amy is a calendar-year taxpayer reporting on the cash basis. Please indicate how she should treat the following items for 2012: a. She makes a deductible contribution to an IRA on April 15,...
-
10. ROLE REVERSAL Write a short-answer question focusing on one of the following: a fixture, an easement, or adverse possession.
-
11. ROLE REVERSAL Write a multiple-choice question highlighting the difference between any two of the following: a contract, an inter vivos gift, or a gift causa mortis.
-
Question: Shannon borrows Marty's car, but when she returns the auto, she hands the keys to Scott, who claims he is Marty's brother. Scott offers a driver's license and passport to reassure Shannon....
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App