A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the target of criticism for its environmental practices. For example, an article an influential newspaper called out the company for its mass-produced furniture that is both "easy to obtain (inexpensive) and abandon (not built to last)." The company's labor practices have also been called into question. Recently, the company has taken what seem to be significant steps toward becoming more socially and ecologically responsible. The company's CEO affirmed the Business Roundtable's Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation (which states that businesses should create value for all stakeholders) and has joined over 200 companies in signing "The Climate Pledge," (a pledge to achieve "Net Zero Carbon" by 2040). In addition to promising better treatment of employees and other workers in its supply chain, the company features several prominently stated environmental goals and activities on its website including aspirations to become net carbon zero, using a high percentage of sustainable materials, etc. These initiatives will be costly to implement. However, some company executives have been encouraged by various reports that seem to indicate a strong business case for creating value for multiple stakeholders. More specifically, they have become aware of surveys in which a significant percentage of "aspirational consumers" worldwide state they only buy from companies that align with their social and environmental values. Moreover, these consumers indicate they are willing to pay higher prices in order to "shop their values." Executives are also aware of the fast-growing ESG (Environment, Social & Governance) investing movement. Based on this information, some members of the executive team believe that the company will not only recoup any additional costs, but will actually increase its profits and share price through attracting customers and socially/ ecologically minded investors. Should executives continue and even expand these efforts based on the presumption that higher profit and improving society are in essential alignment? Why or why not? In other words, how strong is the business case for becoming more stakeholder/sustainability oriented? The furniture company in Question 1 features the following environmental aspirations prominently on its website, social media accounts and promotional messaging: 1) Achieve "net carbon zero" in by 2040. 2) Manufacture with 98% sustainable materials within 5 years (now at 80%). 3) A soon to launch website featuring real time monitoring and reporting of the company's progress toward its stated environmental goals. While these goals seem noble, what should we consider in determining whether they are legitimate ways to advance the goals of sustainability? Explain. A large shareholder owned furniture company known for its trendy, but low-priced merchandise has been the target of criticism for its environmental practices. For example, an article an influential newspaper called out the company for its mass-produced furniture that is both "easy to obtain (inexpensive) and abandon (not built to last)." The company's labor practices have also been called into question. Recently, the company has taken what seem to be significant steps toward becoming more socially and ecologically responsible. The company's CEO affirmed the Business Roundtable's Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation (which states that businesses should create value for all stakeholders) and has joined over 200 companies in signing "The Climate Pledge," (a pledge to achieve "Net Zero Carbon" by 2040). In addition to promising better treatment of employees and other workers in its supply chain, the company features several prominently stated environmental goals and activities on its website including aspirations to become net carbon zero, using a high percentage of sustainable materials, etc. These initiatives will be costly to implement. However, some company executives have been encouraged by various reports that seem to indicate a strong business case for creating value for multiple stakeholders. More specifically, they have become aware of surveys in which a significant percentage of "aspirational consumers" worldwide state they only buy from companies that align with their social and environmental values. Moreover, these consumers indicate they are willing to pay higher prices in order to "shop their values." Executives are also aware of the fast-growing ESG (Environment, Social & Governance) investing movement. Based on this information, some members of the executive team believe that the company will not only recoup any additional costs, but will actually increase its profits and share price through attracting customers and socially/ ecologically minded investors. Should executives continue and even expand these efforts based on the presumption that higher profit and improving society are in essential alignment? Why or why not? In other words, how strong is the business case for becoming more stakeholder/sustainability oriented? The furniture company in Question 1 features the following environmental aspirations prominently on its website, social media accounts and promotional messaging: 1) Achieve "net carbon zero" in by 2040. 2) Manufacture with 98% sustainable materials within 5 years (now at 80%). 3) A soon to launch website featuring real time monitoring and reporting of the company's progress toward its stated environmental goals. While these goals seem noble, what should we consider in determining whether they are legitimate ways to advance the goals of sustainability? Explain.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
The executives of the furniture company have a significant opportunity to align their business strategy with social and environmental values which can potentially lead to both increased profits and po... View the full answer
Related Book For
International Marketing And Export Management
ISBN: 9781292016924
8th Edition
Authors: Gerald Albaum , Alexander Josiassen , Edwin Duerr
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Back to Assignment Attempts Average / 4 9. Problem 12.16 (Replacement Chain) eBook The Lesseig Company has an opportunity to invest in one of two mutually exclusive machines that will produce a...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Describe the Spanish Theocratic Rule during Spain's colonial era in the Philippines?
-
Which of the following are elementary matrices? (a) (b) (c) (d) 3 -5 1 100 100 2001 0010 0100 2000
-
Use the Three-Question Method to verify the ValueInList function described in this chapter.
-
Find the adjoint operator and its domain for \(L u=u^{\prime \prime}+4 u^{\prime}-3 u\), \(u^{\prime}(0)+4 u(0)=0, u^{\prime}(1)+4 u(1)=0\).
-
Hart Manufacturing makes three products. Each product requires manufacturing operations in three departments: A, B, and C. The labor-hour requirements, by department, are as follows: During the next...
-
Jake's Roof Repair has provided the following data concerning its costs: Wages and salaries Parts and supplies Equipment depreciation Cost per Repair-Hour $ 15.00 Fixed Cost per Month $ 21,100 $ 7.60...
-
In limonene, the major volatile compound in orange peel oil, how many carbon atoms are in the sp3 hybridization state. a). 3 b). 4 c). 5 d). 6 e). 7
-
Your bank pays 2.5% interest per year. You put $1,200 in the bank today and $650 more in the bank in one year. How much will you have in the bank in 2 years? In 2 years, the amount that you will have...
-
Your manager, who has an accounting background, is new to QuickBooks Online and is reviewing the General Ledger Report. In her prior experience, there were always debit, credit, and balance columns...
-
Two ice skaters, Judy and Earl, collide on that Musical rink they used to have at Harbourfront. Startled by the collision, Judy grabs onto Earl as they fall and they slide across the ice together....
-
What is the next number in the following series? 9, 14, 13, 18, 17, 22 The next number is .
-
A company has the following capital structure as at 3 1 st December 2 0 2 3 Ordinary share ( 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 shares ) sh . 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 Retained Earnings 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 2 % bonds 3 , 0 0 0...
-
EP Consulting Services won a tender to provide auditing and forensic consulting services to a Technology Company. You have been appointed as the Engagement Partner for this project. You subsequently...
-
Using the parallel-axis theorem, determine the product of inertia of the area shown with respect to the centroidal x and y axes. 6 in. 9 in. 9 in- 4.5 in. in. 4.5 in.
-
In the decade of the 2010s, the plans and operations of Avon Inc. in marketing, research, and manufacturing throughout Asia are still being affected by actions taken after a 1998 meeting. The US...
-
Three things set The Pampered Chef, a direct selling company, apart from its competition in the housewares industry: a passion for providing unique, quality products, a dedication to ensuring...
-
What are the differences and similarities between origin image and the origin biases?
-
Kellogg Company (Kellogg's) acquired 75 percent of the outstanding stock of Wholesome & Hearty Foods ("Wholesome") at the end of 2007, for cash and stock totaling \($120\) million. Wholesome's assets...
-
Placer Industries acquired 80 percent of SAS Shoes several years ago. Placer and SAS have made several intercompany transfers of depreciable assets over the years. Details are below. On June 30,...
-
On January 2, 2015, Pohang Company acquired 80 percent of Suro Corporations voting common stock for \($1.25\) billion. The fair value of the noncontrolling interest at the date of acquisition was...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App