The Major players in the case were Estelle T. Griswold, who was the executive director of...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The Major players in the case were Estelle T. Griswold, who was the executive director of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut at the time, and the State of Connecticut. The root of the conflict goes back to 1879 when Connecticut passed a law that basically banned and penalized anything relating to furthering contraception. This could've been anything like medical advice, drugs, or devices. Fast forward to 1961, Griswold, who had just opened up a clinic along with Dr. Buxton, a gynecologist were both arrested and fined for providing contraceptives and advice to married women. Shortly after, Griswold met with a civil rights lawyer, and she decided to challenge the law by arguing that the law violated the 14th Amendment in the Constitution. This was the goal she had in mind when she opened the clinic initially, she wanted to challenge this law. The levels of government involved in this case were the State and the federal government. This case relates to the concept of federalism because the State had the power to make and enforce this law but was challenged and brought to a higher court, the US Supreme Court. The state of Connecticut argued that the purpose of sex was to procreate, and the law was intended to reduce immorality, but they failed to prove that the law was absolutely necessary. 7/9 Justices agreed that the law did in fact violate the privacy rights of married couples. Although not explicitly in the constitution, they mentioned there were various guarantees in the Bill of Rights that established the right to privacy under the 1st Amendment, 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, and 9th Amendment, they also mentioned that the right to privacy could be found in the 14th amendment under the Due Process Clause. On the other hand, 2/9 Justices felt that the right to privacy could not be found in the Constitution and did not agree with their colleagues. Ultimately The Supreme Court decided 7/9 that the Constitution did protect the privacy rights of married couples. the state could not prohibit the use of contraceptives, thus striking down this 86-year-old law. But they were very clear this ruling would not protect unmarried people. Although this case primarily focused on the privacy of just married couples, I agree with the court ruling that Connecticut's law was unconstitutional. It was definitely a huge win for reproductive rights. This ruling on privacy eventually paved the way for many future cases that came along, one of them being the famous Roe v. Wade court decision. Reply Quote Email Author Hide 1 reply The Major players in the case were Estelle T. Griswold, who was the executive director of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut at the time, and the State of Connecticut. The root of the conflict goes back to 1879 when Connecticut passed a law that basically banned and penalized anything relating to furthering contraception. This could've been anything like medical advice, drugs, or devices. Fast forward to 1961, Griswold, who had just opened up a clinic along with Dr. Buxton, a gynecologist were both arrested and fined for providing contraceptives and advice to married women. Shortly after, Griswold met with a civil rights lawyer, and she decided to challenge the law by arguing that the law violated the 14th Amendment in the Constitution. This was the goal she had in mind when she opened the clinic initially, she wanted to challenge this law. The levels of government involved in this case were the State and the federal government. This case relates to the concept of federalism because the State had the power to make and enforce this law but was challenged and brought to a higher court, the US Supreme Court. The state of Connecticut argued that the purpose of sex was to procreate, and the law was intended to reduce immorality, but they failed to prove that the law was absolutely necessary. 7/9 Justices agreed that the law did in fact violate the privacy rights of married couples. Although not explicitly in the constitution, they mentioned there were various guarantees in the Bill of Rights that established the right to privacy under the 1st Amendment, 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment, and 9th Amendment, they also mentioned that the right to privacy could be found in the 14th amendment under the Due Process Clause. On the other hand, 2/9 Justices felt that the right to privacy could not be found in the Constitution and did not agree with their colleagues. Ultimately The Supreme Court decided 7/9 that the Constitution did protect the privacy rights of married couples. the state could not prohibit the use of contraceptives, thus striking down this 86-year-old law. But they were very clear this ruling would not protect unmarried people. Although this case primarily focused on the privacy of just married couples, I agree with the court ruling that Connecticut's law was unconstitutional. It was definitely a huge win for reproductive rights. This ruling on privacy eventually paved the way for many future cases that came along, one of them being the famous Roe v. Wade court decision. Reply Quote Email Author Hide 1 reply
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Griswold v Connecticut A Landmark Case in Reproductive Rights and Privacy Background and Major Players The key figures in the case were Estelle T Gris... View the full answer
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
H I , I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT STEP 3 . I n the e q . o f Efar ( ) , I don't understand the a p e r t u r e E ( x , y ) , what does the aperture mean?And I notice E o i s outside the integral, I want...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Given the following cash flows, what is the present value if the discount rate is 8 % ? Year 1 2 3 4 Cash Flow $ 2 0 0 $ 3 5 0 $ 8 0 0 $ 1 1 2 5 A ) $ 1 , 1 1 5 . 0 7 B ) $ 1 , 9 4 7 . 2 3 C ) $ 2 ,...
-
4. Jerry intends to use the money from his loan (and his personal savings if necessary) to make an investment in his friend Elaines business. In return, Elaine has predicted the following returns on...
-
A political candidate, Bill McWaffle, is personally indifferent on the issue of the legalization of gambling in his state and to this point has not taken a public stand. The election is fast...
-
For calendar year 2015, Stuart and Pamela Gibson file a joint return reflecting AGI of $350,000. Their itemized deductions are as follows: Casualty loss after $100 floor (not covered by...
-
Hindu Industries had sales in 2002 of \($6,300,000\) and gross profit of \($1,500,000\). Management is considering two alternative budget plans to increase its gross profit in 2003. Plan A would...
-
The Prism gas permeation process developed by the Monsanto Company is highly selective for hydrogen when using hollow-fiber membranes of materials such as silicone-coated polysulphone. In a typical...
-
An argument that is invalid is also known as a An argument that is invalid is also known as a
-
Problem 1 (1 pts) Let w(.), D, d(.) respectively denote the willingness-to-pay (wtp) density function (distribution), market size and demand function, where functions have price arguments. Parts a),...
-
Sue receives a yearly salary of $32000 She is paid bi-weekly and her regular workweek is 37.5 hours. What is the hourly rate of pay?
-
What might be a better label for the Learning and Growth measures in the Balanced Scorecard?
-
Salary expense at SlowCooker is $ 6 , 0 0 0 per week for a Tuesday Sunday workweek. Employees are paid on Sunday. a . If the company s year ends on a Tuesday, what adjusting entry must it make? b ....
-
A solenoid consists of 250 loops where each loop has an area A = 1.50 cm2 and the length of the solenoid is L = 12.0 cm. If the solenoid has a current I = 0.500 A, what is the magnitude of the...
-
Use an ungraduated pipette (dropper/transfer pipette) to find out how many drops there are in 1 ml of water. Count the number of drops needed to fill a 10-ml graduated cylinder to the 5 ml mark....
-
When a random sample is not representative of the population as a whole, we refer to it as sampling error. What can you do to reduce your risk of sampling error? In other words, what can you change...
-
Why is the national security argument for tariffs questionable?
-
Define: convertible bond, bond with equity warrants, preference share, investment certificate and bond redeemable in shares.
-
The bond market yield is 7%. A company issues a bond with equity warrants at a gross yield to maturity of 3% assuming the warrants are not exercised. What is the cost of this product? What is the...
-
Is a convertible bond more costly to the issuing company than a bond with equity warrants?
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App