1. Do you think the court was influenced by the fact that the employees in question were professional employees in an architectural firm? Why?
2. Was the Board's finding of employer domination more of a reaction to the unusual nature of the employee committee than to the facts of the alleged interference?
3. The union had failed to reach an agreement with the employer after more than a year of bargaining. Was the employees' freedom of choice stifled by that fact, so that the selection of the alternative system did represent employer domination?