1. How many shareholders were present at the shareholders’ meeting that gave rise to the dispute in this case?
2. How did the court “characterize” and “classify” the shares of stock that Cale and Shirley Case held jointly?
3. According to the court, how many shares were represented at the shareholders’ meeting? Was a quorum present? Explain.
4. Were the shares that Cale owned jointly with Shirley voted at the meeting? How did the jointly owned shares affect the business conducted? Explain.