1. The city had suggested that instead of binding arbitration, an advisory arbitration system be invoked which would require that the arbitrator's award be returned to the council for final action. Would this be a better system?
2. Certainly, the standards cited by the court give the arbitrator wide latitude in deciding specific contract issues. Could the standards be any more rigid and still give the arbitrator the flexibility necessary to affect the legislative purpose of the Act, that is, orderly and constructive relationship between the public employers and their employees?