Question: 1. Why did the court conclude that the parties in this case were not bound by the settlement and release documents signed by Gyabaah? 2.

1. Why did the court conclude that the parties in this case were not bound by the settlement and release documents signed by Gyabaah?
2. Why did Aronsky fail to deliver the signed documents to Rivlab or its insurer?
3. What is the most likely reason that Gyabaah did not wish to settle the case with Rivlab or its insurer according to their terms?
4. If Aronsky had informed Rivlab or its insurer that Gyabaah had agreed to the settlement, would her later “change of heart” have been sufficient to set aside the agreement?
[Adwoa Gyabaah was hit by a bus owned by Rivlab Transportation Corporation. She retained attorney Jeffrey Aronsky to represent her in negotiations with Rivlab, its insurer National Casualty Company, and their attorneys. Gyabaah agreed to pay Aronsky a contingency fee of one-third of the amount of her recovery. Aronsky] commenced this personal injury action on plaintiff’s behalf on August 25, 2010 [ against Rivlab]. By letter to Aronsky dated October 1, 2010, defendant’s carrier tendered its $ 1 million policy limits for purposes of settlement. Aronsky explained the proposal to plaintiff who, at that time, chose to accept the settlement.

Step by Step Solution

3.29 Rating (170 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 The court concluded that the parties in this case were not bound by the settlement and release signed by Gyabaah because the documents were not deli... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

311-L-B-L-C (1149).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!