1. Why should Hoggatt be personally liable if he merely followed the instructions of his employer, SDI,...

Question:

1. Why should Hoggatt be personally liable if he merely followed the instructions of his employer, SDI, given that the employer is better able financially to pay the judgment and may have insurance that covers the matter?

2. How could SDI reduce the likelihood of similar lawsuits occurring in the future?


Southwest Desert Images, LLC (SDI) was hired by Warner’s employer, Aegis Communications (Aegis), to perform landscaping and weed control. On September 29, 2003, SDI employee [David] Hoggatt began spraying an herbicide on weeds on the property around Aegis’s building. * * * After approximately an hour and a half of spraying, Hoggatt was informed that people inside Aegis’s building were complaining. The herbicide spray had entered the building through its air conditioning system and had circulated throughout the building. After being informed of the situation, Hoggatt stopped spraying. Emergency services arrived as the building was being evacuated. Employees in the building complained of respiratory problems and itching and burning eyes.


Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Business Law Text and Cases

ISBN: 978-1111929954

12th Edition

Authors: Kenneth W. Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller, Frank B. Cross

Question Posted: