a) Compare the government's power to regulate commercial speech with its power over other forms of speech?

Question:

a) Compare the government's power to regulate commercial speech with its power over other forms of speech?
b) Why has the Supreme Court historically permitted greater regulation of commercial speech?
c) For a government regulation of commercial speech to be valid, what standard must it meet?
d) What was the state interest served in this case?
e) If Salib conceded on that point, what was his problem with the law?
f) What does "narrowly tailored" mean?
g) What was the court's point on whether the regulation was narrowly tailored?