a) The court seems to regard Jones's allegations as trivial. In fact, hasn't she alleged disgusting behavior by her employer? How can the court regard her claims so lightly?
b) What is the judge obligated to decide?
c) Doesn't summary judgment mean that there will be no trial?
d) How can a judge decide whether there was sexual harassment without holding a trial? We do not know whether Clinton did these things or not.
e) What is missing from Jones's allegations?