Question: a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment? b. Was Kent driving to or from work when the accident
a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment?
b. Was Kent driving to or from work when the accident happened?
c. Was he involved in any diplomatic activity at the time of the accident?
d. Why was Kent at the gym?
e. Was he going to do any more work that day?
f. Who leased his apartment?
g. Was he acting within the scope of employment?
Douglas Kent was the Consul General of the United States in Vladivostok, Russia. One evening, he drove from his office to a gym and then home. On the way home, he was involved in an accident that left Aleksandr Kashin severely injured. Kashin sued the United States government, claiming that Kent was within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.
Step by Step Solution
3.44 Rating (180 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Because if Kent was acting within the scope of h... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
842-L-B-L-L-E (4324).docx
120 KBs Word File
