Question: a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment? b. Was Kent driving to or from work when the accident

a. Why would Kashin care if Kent was acting within his scope of employment?
b. Was Kent driving to or from work when the accident happened?
c. Was he involved in any diplomatic activity at the time of the accident?
d. Why was Kent at the gym?
e. Was he going to do any more work that day?
f. Who leased his apartment?
g. Was he acting within the scope of employment?
Douglas Kent was the Consul General of the United States in Vladivostok, Russia. One evening, he drove from his office to a gym and then home. On the way home, he was involved in an accident that left Aleksandr Kashin severely injured. Kashin sued the United States government, claiming that Kent was within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident.

Step by Step Solution

3.44 Rating (180 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

a Because if Kent was acting within the scope of h... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

842-L-B-L-L-E (4324).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!