An MIT study has estimated costs for producing steel with three different technologies: (1) coke, blast furnace,

Question:

An MIT study has estimated costs for producing steel with three different technologies: (1) coke, blast furnace, basic oxygen furnace, ingots, and finishing mills; (2) coke, blast furnace, basic oxygen furnace, continuous casting, and finishing mills; and (3) steel scrap, electric arc furnace, continuous casting, and finishing mills. Under reasonable assumptions concerning input prices, the estimated average costs per ton are as follows:
An MIT study has estimated costs for producing steel with

a. The MIT report concludes that "unless significant changes occur in other technologies, the electric- furnace continuous- casting route will dominate domestic production." Why?
b. At the same time, the report notes that the price of scrap (which is used in this route) "could increase as electric furnace production expands because of the increased demand." Why is this relevant?
c. The report also concludes that regardless of which of these technologies is used, cost per ton is about 25 to 30% higher if wages are $26 per hour rather than $2 per hour. What does this imply about the competitiveness of U.S. steel producers relative to producers in other countries that pay wages far below U.S. levels?
d. If these cost figures are long- run average costs, under what circumstances would they also equal long- run marginal costs?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Managerial Economics Theory Applications and Cases

ISBN: 978-0393912777

8th edition

Authors: Bruce Allen, Keith Weigelt, Neil A. Doherty, Edwin Mansfield

Question Posted: