Question: Bath Iron Works (BIW) offered a job to Thomas Devine, contingent on Devines passing a drug test. The testing was conducted by NorDx, a subcontractor

Bath Iron Works (BIW) offered a job to Thomas Devine, contingent on Devine’s passing a drug test. The testing was conducted by NorDx, a subcontractor of Roche Biomedical Laboratories. When NorDx found that Devine’s urinalysis showed the presence of opiates, a result confirmed by Roche, BIW refused to offer Devine permanent employment. Devine sued Roche, claiming that the ingestion of poppy seeds can yield a positive result and that he tested positive only because of his daily consumption of poppy seed muffins. Devine argued that he was a third party beneficiary of the contract between his prospective employer (BIW) and NorDx (Roche). Is Devine an intended third party beneficiary of the BIW–NorDx contract? Why or why not? Do drug- testing labs have a duty to the persons being tested to exercise reasonable care in conducting the tests? Explain.

Step by Step Solution

3.25 Rating (163 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

In most cases it seems only fair that an employee who loses his or her job due to erroneous drugtesting ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

311-L-B-L-C (1196).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!