Question: Dr. Gregory B. Nazar removed a malignant tumor from Roe Branhams brain on February 27, 2000. The surgery was a success, but shortly afterward Branham

Dr. Gregory B. Nazar removed a malignant tumor from Roe Branham’s brain on February 27, 2000. The surgery was a success, but shortly afterward Branham began to experience pain in his head. The pain was dismissed as being a side effect of the surgery. The pain continued for several weeks, and a medical assessment uncovered a Durahook (a small, metallic object used to hold soft tissues apart) that was left in Branham’s scalp during the surgery. On August 10, 2000, the hook was surgically removed without complications. The second procedure cost Branham $11,900. What would Branham have to prove to win a case based on medical malpractice? Who ultimately won the case? Nazar v. Branham, 291 S.W.3d 599 (Ky. 2009).


Step by Step Solution

3.40 Rating (159 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Branham had to prove that Nazer had a duty to care tha... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

244-L-B-L-L-E (1953).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!