Question: Given the set of functional dependencies F {fd1, fd2, fd3, fd4, fd5, fd6, fd7, fd8, fd9, f10, f11} where: a. Construct the universal relation schema
Given the set of functional dependencies F {fd1, fd2, fd3, fd4, fd5, fd6, fd7, fd8, fd9, f10, f11} where:
-1.png)
-2.png)
a. Construct the universal relation schema that includes (i.e., preserves) the set of functional dependencies in F.
b. Do the functional dependencies shown constitute a minimal cover of F? If not, derive a minimal cover.
c. Derive the candidate key(s) of F.
d. Select the primary key and justify your choice.
e. Considering your primary key and candidate key(s), distinguish between (1) key versus non-key attributes and (2) prime versus non-prime attributes.
fdl: Client Office fd3: BrokerProfile fd5: Client Risk profile, Analyst) fd2: Stock (Exchange, Dividend) fd4: Company Stock fd: Analyst Broker fd 7: {Stock. Broker){Investment, Volume) fd9: Investment(Commission, Return fdl1: Account Assets | fas: stock-> Company fd10: Stock, Broker Client
Step by Step Solution
3.43 Rating (153 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a URS Client Office Stock Exchange Dividend Broker Profile Company Riskprofile Analyst Investment Volume Commission Return Account Assets b Following the algorithm prescribed to derive a minimal cover ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
887-CS-DB (2173).docx
120 KBs Word File
