Hudson & Muma, Inc., was a small, family-owned insurance agency. Andrew Muma, the son of the founder, was an officer, shareholder, and director of the company. Andrew left the company and began working as a commissioned salesman for another insurance agency; Wolf-Hulbert Co. Hudson & Muma filed a suit against Wolf-Hulbert, alleging that Andrew had taken customer information that was a trade secret. Wolf-Hulbert argued that it had no knowledge of this, and the trial court granted a motion dismissing the action. Hudson & Muma appealed. How should the appellate court decide? Why? [Hudson & Muma, Inc. v. Wolf-Hulbert Co., ___ N.W.2d ___ (Mich.App. 2010)]