In a famous and much discussed essay Anthony Flew applied the method of hypothesis falsification to the discussion of the existence of God. Could we, he asked, treat the hypothesis "God exists" as a meaningful one? His answer is "no" because those who believe in the existence of God would accept no evidence that would falsify such a belief; hence the hypothesis "God exists" is not a valid hypothesis.
Craft a PowerPoint presentation that outlines and critically examines the argument made by Flew. Specifically, how does he demonstrate that no theist would ever accept any evidence that would falsify the hypothesis "God exists"? What is his key example and how does it work to support his conclusion? What critical response could be made to Flew's argument?