Question: In Section 2.9, we stated a number of Fourier transform theorems without proof. Using the Fourier syntheses or analyses equations ? (Eqs. (2.133) and (2.134)),
In Section 2.9, we stated a number of Fourier transform theorems without proof. Using the Fourier syntheses or analyses equations ? (Eqs. (2.133) and (2.134)), demonstrate the validity of Theorems 1 ? 5 in Table 2.2.
![x[n] = . | x(elu)elndw, (2.133) X(ei") = *[n]e=jum_ (2.134) Sequence x[n]](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/si.experts.images/questions/2022/11/636a501adc433_706636a501acc081.jpg)
x[n] = . | x(elu)elndw, (2.133) X(ei") = *[n]e=jum_ (2.134) Sequence x[n] y[n] Fourier Transform X(ejw) Y(ei") 1. ax[n] + by[n] aX(el@) + bY(elw) e- juma X (ej@) 2. x[n na] (na an integer) 3. ejmon x[n] X (e(w-wo)) X(e-j) X* (ej") if x[n] real. 4. x[-n] dX(el) 5. [n] dw X (el")Y(ej") 6. x[n] * y[n] 7. x[n]y[n] X (el )Y(ej(w-e))d 27 Parseval's theorem: I lx[n]? = |X(e]"fdw 2 9. ) x[n]y*[ri] = X(el")Y*(el")dw
Step by Step Solution
3.48 Rating (164 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
30-E-T-E-D-S-P (73).docx
120 KBs Word File
