Length is not very important in evaluating the quality of corks because it has little to do
Question:
a. Does the preceding sample give sufficient reason to show that the mean length is different from 45.0 mm, at the 0.02 level of significance? A different random sample of 18 corks is taken from the same batch.
b. Does the preceding sample give sufficient reason to show that the mean length is different from 45.0 mm, at the 0.02 level of significance?
c. What effect did the two different sample means have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
d. What effect did the two different sample sizes have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
e. What effect did the two different sample standard deviations have on the calculated test statistic in parts a and b? Explain.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: