Like many other states, Connecticut requires nonresidents of the state who are enrolled in the state university system to pay tuition and other fees at higher rates than residents of the state who are so enrolled. A Connecticut statute defined as a nonresident any unmarried student if his or her “legal address for any part of the one-year period immediately prior to [his or her] application for admission.was outside of Connecticut,” or any married student if his or her “legal address at the time of his application for admission.was outside of Connecticut.” The statute also provided that the “status of a student, as established at the time of [his or her] application for admission. shall be [his or her] status for the entire period of his attendance.” Two University of Connecticut students who claimed to be residents of Connecticut were by the statute classified as nonresidents for tuition purposes. They claimed that the Due Process Clause does not permit Connecticut to deny an individual the opportunity to present evidence that he or she is a bona fide resident entitled to state rates and that they were being deprived of property without due process. Is this a valid argument?