On April 6, 1988, Luis Serrano purchased for $75,000 a 268long Carrera speedboat named Hot Shot. First
Question:
On May 2, 1988, Serrano sold the boat to Reinaldo Polito, and Serrano furnished First Federal with documents evidencing the sale. Polito assumed the obligation to pay off the balance due First Federal. On October 6, 1989, Serrano again applied to El Fenix for a new yacht policy, covering the period from October 6, 1989, through October 6, 1990, and the coverage extended to peril of confiscation by a governmental agency. Serrano did not have ownership or possession of the boat on October 6, 1989. First Federal, the named payee, had not perfected or recorded a mortgage on Hot Shot until July 5, 1990. On November 13, 1989, in the waters off Cooper Island in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Hot Shot was found abandoned after a chase by governmental officials. A large shipment of cocaine was recovered, although no one was arrested. When Serrano and First Federal were informed that Hot Shot was subject to mandatory forfeiture under BVI law, they both filed claims under the October 6, 1989, insurance policy. What defenses would you raise on behalf of the insurer in this case? Decide. [El Fenix v Serrano Gutierrez, 786 F Supp 1065 (DPR)]
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Andersons Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-0324786668
21st Edition
Authors: David p. twomey, Marianne moody Jennings
Question Posted: