On January 1, 2015, Skull Valley Motors leased a Lincoln Navigator to T. K. Pusan Boots Denny.
Question:
On January 1, 2015, Skull Valley Motors leased a Lincoln Navigator to T. K. "Pusan Boots" Denny. The lease is a three-year lease requiring a payment of $695 at the end of each month for 36 months. The cash price of the Navigator was $46,000. Skull Valley Motors expects to be able to sell the Navigator for $30,652 when it is returned at the end of the three-year lease term.
1. What interest rate (compounded monthly) was used in the computation of the $695 monthly payment amount?
2. On December 31, 2017, Skull Valley Motors learned that the Navigator could be sold for only $25,000 at auction instead of the anticipated $30,652. With this actual residual value, what rate of return (compounded monthly) did Skull Valley earn on this three-year Navigator lease?
3. Assume that Skull Valley did not know about the decline in residual value until the Navigator was sold at auction for $25,000 in 2017. How much net profit, in total, was recognized during the three-year life of the lease, excluding the final sale of the Navigator at auction? How much gain or loss was recognized when the Navigator was sold for $25,000 at auction?
4. Refer to (2). If the rate of return on the lease is so low, why would Skull Valley Motors continue in the leasing business at all?
Step by Step Answer: