On January 16, 1974, petitioner and respondent signed a contract whereby the petitioner agreed to employ the
Question:
When the petitioner signed these agreements he was 19 years old and thus, according to the law in effect at that time, he was legally an infant. The court held that arbitration was the proper way to handle the dispute.
1. Did the court rule that the entire contract was valid? Could one provision in the contract be valid and enforceable while the rest of the contract is not valid?
2. What is the New York court's general attitude toward arbitration?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: