Plaintiff, a minor, alleged that his grandfather Schultz had made an oral contract with the plaintiff through his mother. In this alleged contract, Schultz agreed to give the plaintiff certain real estate if the plaintiffs mother would name the plaintiff after him. The plaintiffs parents accepted the proposal because they had in fact already named their son after Schultz. However, Schultz never arranged for the title of the property to pass to the plaintiff. He did deliver possession of the real estate to the plaintiff s parents. The plaintiff requested that the court determine that he is the absolute owner of the real estate. Was the alleged contract between Schultz and the plaintiffs mother supported by consideration and therefore en force able?