Question: Read and brief the following two cases. N.E. Soliman v. Commissioner, 113 S.Ct. 701; 93-1 USTC 50,014; 71 AFTR2d 93-463 N.E. Soliman v. Commissioner, 935
Read and brief the following two cases.
N.E. Soliman v. Commissioner, 113 S.Ct. 701; 93-1 USTC ¶50,014; 71 AFTR2d 93-463
N.E. Soliman v. Commissioner, 935 F2d 52; 91-1 USTC ¶50,291; 67 AFTR2d 91-1112
a. Were the judges in the Supreme Court decision unanimous or split? How do you know?
b. What does Revenue Ruling 94-24, 1994-1 CB 87 add to your understanding of this Code provision and the Soliman case?
c. Read IRC §280A(c)(l)(A). Has Congress amended this provision since Soliman and the revenue ruling? In what way? How do the changes affect the authority of the Soliman case? Can you imagine factual situations in which Soliman might still apply?
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (166 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a The judges in the Supreme Court decision were split Justice Stevens filed a dissenting opinion See short brief following b The Revenue Ruling 9424 19941 CB 87 explained how the service will apply th... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
881-L-B-L-T-L (4975).docx
120 KBs Word File
