In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, the court

a. felt that the defendants were in a better position to bear the cost of the plaintiff’s injuries than was the plaintiff.

b. reasoned that when there was a conflict between an innocent plaintiff and negligent defendants, the plaintiff should prevail.

c. concluded that any defendant manufacturer that could not prove that it had not produced the dosages of DES consumed by the plaintiff’s mother would be liable for the portion of the judgment that represented its share of the DES market at the time of the mother’s consumption.

d. all of the above.