1. Based on the evidence presented in this case study, was Mortenson’s work at the CAI an example of deliberate fraud or mismanagement? Defend your position.

2. How does the conduct of the CAI board relate to this case?

3. From a business ethics perspective, which was worse, the conduct of the CAI board or the conduct of Mortenson himself? Why?

4. Why would CAI want to keep Mortenson in a “visionary” capacity?

5. If Mortenson’s claims have misled donors, should the CAI return the money? Why or why not?

6. What should be done to restore the reputation of the CAI?