All Matches

Solution Library

Expert Answer

Textbooks

Search Textbook questions, tutors and Books

Oops, something went wrong!

Change your search query and then try again

Result Not Found

Books FREE
Tutors
Study Help
Hire a Tutor
AI Study Help New

Search
Sign In
Register

study help
business
industrial organizational psychology understanding the workplace

Questions and Answers of Industrial Organizational Psychology Understanding The Workplace

Define environmental behaviour, pro‐environmental behaviour, and goal‐directed proenvironmental behaviour.
Describe in what ways physical disorder can make deviant behaviour spread.
Give four examples of environmental cues that increase or decrease the relative strengths of the normative goal. Consider direct and indirect effects.
Briefly explain how goal‐framing theory can be applied to trace the influence of environmental cues on normative behaviour.
Provide three ways in which place attachments are relevant for understanding real‐world problems.
Name and describe three types of place attachments identified in this chapter.
Define place attachments. What are some of the components of place attachment?
Explain briefly the four functions of measuring QoL.
Describe the difference between unidimensional and multidimensional QoL measures.
List one advantage and one disadvantage of subjective QoL measures.
Briefly discuss the multi‐place approach to residential satisfaction.
Which are the different measures of urban environmental quality? Briefly explain each of them.
Which features and conditions of urban environments can promote individual wellbeing?What are the psychological processes implied?
Which environmental conditions of urban settings tend to have a negative influence on urban environmental quality? What are the psychological processes implied?
Besides social design, which other modern building design approaches have striven for the promotion of human well‐being and behaviour?
Describe the six goals of social design.
How can differences in the appraisal of built settings between architects and laypersons be explained?
Mention at least three differences between architects and laypersons in their appraisal of built settings.
Mention two physical attributes and two observer characteristics that have consistently been found to influence the aesthetic appraisal of built settings.
Give two examples of green interventions that may be used to reduce health inequities between children from families with a low and high socioeconomic status.
Describe, if possible, an impressive experience with nature from your own childhood.Which type of experience was it? How did it affect you?
Explain what ‘hands‐on‐learning’ is and how this can strengthen children’s connectedness to nature.
Describe what Louv means by ‘nature‐deficit disorder’ and why this could be alarming for society.
How can ambivalence in emotional and cognitive responses towards nature be explained?
Which two kinds of landscapes typically evoke ambivalent (positive and negative)responses?
Describe the four views of the relationship between humans and nature that have been identified in empirical research.
Give an example of cognitive dissonance in politics and another example in consumer decisions.
Provide two responses to the question of why voters might select an authoritarian leader.
Should we try to persuade the programmers for search engines to stop presenting information to individuals based on their search history.Why or why not?
Apply what you know about the role of ideology in politics to health care. How might this obstacle lead to poor health choices?
Why is disregard for the truth a dangerous obstacle to critical thinking about political issues?
Ennis used “correct assessment of statements” as his definition of critical thinking. Provide at least two other possible definitions that could be inferred from this chapter.
For the six ways for resisting social influence, discuss how each can be implemented. What problems will arise? Are there conditions under which the suggested way of reducing susceptibility to
Keep track of the social influence you receive in a day. How easy is it to identify these tactics? How did the social-influence tactic change your behavior (if it did)? If the influence attempt was
Conduct a social influence analysis by identifying a situation where social-influence tactics are widely used. (Some possible situations include car dealerships, cults, cosmetic counters, sales,
For each of the social influence tactics described in this chapter, find an original application of the tactic. (Try to find ones you encounter in your everyday life rather than the one presented in
Find examples of the use of the projection tactic. How is the tactic used?How do you know it is a false allegation? What are the effects of the use of the projection tactic?
Select a group known for their extreme positions or for their violent actions (for example, a white supremacy group, a cult, an extreme political party). How does the rationalization trap lead to the
The use of Myth #1 (You have to be crazy to do crazy things) and Myth#2 (People who do crazy things must be infected by some crazy influence) to describe the causes of persuasion and influence can
It is often easier for us to recognize social-influence attempts when we disagree with the communicator. Try to make a list of “agreeable and accepted” popular beliefs.What evidence can be
What are some factors thatmight make transfer of training hard to achieve?
What are some of the obstacles that people encounter that prevent them from thinking critically?
In what ways is critical thinking domain-general and in what ways is it domain-specific?
What are examples of critical thinking processes in the context of scientific reasoning?
What is a metacomponent? What are some examples of metacomponents?
Finally, I cannot recommend this study for publication because the results were not shown to be the same for boys and girls, suggesting a bias against girls in the study.
The writing in the study also was hard to understand because of overuse of abbreviations that were never defined.
Nowhere in the study are my own studies on attachment cited, which shows a distinct lack of scholarship.
We also cannot determine whether these results would generalize to people later in their lives, such as when they are in their old age.
Curiously, the article never really defines what the different attachment styles are, so it is more difficult than it should be to interpret the results.
A number of effects are significant at the 0.001 level, but what we do not know from the data analysis is whether these effects were also significant at the standard 0.05 level of significance.
In the Results section, a power analysis has been done, but what really needs to be done is an analysis to understand whether the sample sizes were large enough to detect whether there were effects
The study was conducted only with subjects in the Northeast, so it is not clear whether the results would generalize to other parts of the country or to other countries.
Another problem with the study is that the authors did not randomly assign students either to age groups or to attachment styles, so random assignment, the gold standard for experimental research,
For another thing, they state the number of boys in the study (495)and the total number of subjects (1028), but never directly state the number of girls.
For one thing, their whole study is suspect because they do not have exactly equal numbers of children of 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 years of age.For example, there are 198 8-year-olds but 203 10-year-olds.
The authors of the article show themselves to be foolish.
The article “Attachment Styles in Children of Middle Childhood,”explores the various attachment styles found in children of 8 to 12 years old, including secure, anxious-resistant,
Many academics believe there is a momentum effect in the careers of working scientists. Early success in securing external funding for research and publishing findings in leading scholarly journals
Dr. Glurpple is familiar with the relevant empirical research and finds it hard to understand why so many players, coaches, fans, and analysts believe in the power of sports momentum. If only people
Cognitive heuristics such as availability, representativeness, or anchoring and insufficient adjustment can lead to systematic biases in judgments or decisions. How is this different from saying that
Suppose that NFL team A trades for a star player and wins their next several games, team B experiences an injury to a star player and loses their next several games, and a sports analyst says these
Dr. Flurpple is recognized as one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation, with an influential record of scholarly publications and an impressive list of professional honors and awards.
Does the experiment contribute to knowledge? What do you know after reading the study that you did not know before, and why does that knowledge matter?
Are the data publicly available?
Were researcher degrees of freedom adequately disclosed, and choices justified?
Is the uncertainty in the data adequately conveyed (e.g. with confidence intervals for effect sizes)?
If the study was pre-registered, were pre-registered hypotheses and analyses clearly distinguished from any exploratory analyses?
Was the study pre-registered, and did analyses and findings conform with the pre-registered predictions? (This procedure still rarely occurs.)
Did the study have sufficient statistical power for all the tests reported?
What generality might the experiment have, what external validity? Do you think the same effects would be obtained with (a) different types of subjects; (b) different experimental settings or
How would you rate the probable internal validity of the experiment?That is, do you think it can be directly replicated? Why?
If a between-subjects design was used, did the author use an appropriate procedure (randomization, matching) for ensuring that the subject groups did not differ?
If the author used a within-subjects design, were practice effects controlled by appropriate counterbalancing? Did the author consider differential carryover effects?
Did the author use a within-subjects or between-subjects design? Why do you think this choice was made? Is it the right choice?
What variables are being controlled? Are there others that should be controlled?
What dependent measures are being examined? Do they actually measure the construct of interest? Can you think of other measures that should be used?
Are other variables confounded with the independent variable that is being manipulated?
What are the independent variables being manipulated? Does the manipulation seem to be an effective one? Will it permit a fair test of the hypothesis?
Does the experiment follow from the assumptions in the hypothesis? Can you think of more effective methods to use in testing the hypotheses?
What hypothesis is the research testing? Is it clearly stated?
Why did the authors make the claim that one function of skepticism is the subversion of action? In what ways might skepticism have produced inaction in your life?
What strategies might be adopted to help faculty become less riskaverse, particularly when it comes to accepting criticism from their peers or their students?
When the teaching or application of critical thinking becomes routine then it is not likely to be sufficiently critical, that is, reasoned, reflective, and rigorous. What can psychology educators do
What are some of the advantages of construing critical thinking as statebased rather than trait-based? What challenges does a state-based approach provide where teaching and learning is concerned?
Despite the popularity of critical thinking activities in psychology courses, why are psychology faculty members slow to assess the efficacy of their efforts? In other words, we need to know what
What can you do to become more independent in your thinking from your peers’ opinions, experience less fear of missing out, and take the“remote control” of your emotional life through social
Studies indicate that increasing smartphone use by parents and children is eradicating face-to-face conversation within families. What would be a small set of easy-to-memorize behavioral rules that a
A 50-year old woman without symptoms participates in mammography screening and tests positive. She is frightened by the prospect of having breast cancer. The sensitivity of mammography is 90 percent,
You play a lottery where only one out of every 1,000 tickets wins. You buy one ticket. The probability that you will win is _____ percent.
James checks the weather report on his smartphone. It says “a 30 percent chance of rain tomorrow.” But 30 percent of what? He assumes it means that it will rain tomorrow 30 percent of the time.
And does the presence of a single viewpoint mean that it lacks rationality?
Do you agree with them that increasing viewpoint diversity will lead to more rigorous thinking?
Do Ceci and Williams equate rigorous thinking with viewpoint diversity?
When you think of diversity on campus, do you think of ethnic and gender diversity? What other kinds of diversity do you think is valuable and why?
What are some benefits to hiring diverse faculty, and what are some disadvantages of doing so?
How similar is your college/university to those in Table 8.1 that are largely comprised of Democratic-liberal faculty? Would you like more political diversity among your own faculty or is this not an
What is an echo chamber? Explain why it does not promote critical thinking.
Define fallacy. Give an example of a straw man, ad hominem, slippery slope, and false dilemma fallacy.
Define confirmation bias and give an example of a time when you committed this prevalent bias.

Showing 900 - 1000 of 7639

First
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Last

Services

Sitemap
Fun
Definitions
Become Tutor
Study Help Categories
Recent Questions
Expert Questions

Company Info

Security
Copyrights
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
SolutionInn Fee
Scholarship

Get In Touch

About Us
Contact Us
Career
Jobs
FAQ
Campus Ambassador

Secure Payment

Download Our App

© 2024 SolutionInn. All Rights Reserved