Assume that Arthur Rabe is suing Xavier Sanchez for breaching a contract in which Sanchez promised to
Question:
Assume that Arthur Rabe is suing Xavier Sanchez for breaching a contract in which Sanchez promised to sell Rabe a Van Gogh painting for $3 million.
(a) In this lawsuit, who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant?
(b) Suppose that Rabe wants Sanchez to perform the contract as promised. What remedy would Rabe seek from the court?
(c) Now suppose that Rabe wants to cancel the contract because Sanchez fraudulently misrepresented the painting as an original Van Gogh when in fact it is a copy.What remedy would Rabe seek?
(d) Will the remedy Rabe seeks in either situation be a remedy at law or a remedy in equity? What is the dif ference between legal and equitable remedies?
(e) Suppose that the trial court finds in Rabe’s favor and grants one of these remedies.Sanchez then appeals the decision to a higher court. On appeal, which party will be the appellant (or petitioner),and which party will be the appellee (or respondent)?
Step by Step Answer: