Divestment of a business: interpreting financial disclosures* British Telecom (BT), the UK telecoms group, assembled all its

Question:

Divestment of a business: interpreting financial disclosures*

British Telecom (BT), the UK telecoms group, assembled all its wireless operations in a new subsidiary, mmO2 plc. Because BT’s fixed line and wireless operations had ‘different market focus and expected growth characteristics’, its board of directors decided in 2001 to split off mmO2. Under the scheme, two new holding companies, BT Group and mmO2, were established, one for fixed line and the other for wireless operations. A BT shareholder received one share in BT Group plc and one share in mmO2 plc for every share they held in the old BT. Trading in the shares of the two companies began on the London Stock Exchange on 19 November 2001.

Exhibit 14.17 shows the pro forma balance sheet of BT Group plc – after adjustment for mmO2 plc

– at 30 June 2001.

BT’s management decided that, in view of mmO2’s current losses and its expected heavy capital outlays, it should carry less debt as an independent entity than it had as part of BT. As a result, debt was transferred from mmO2 to BT Group (see third column of Exhibit 14.17).image text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

Required

(a) What type of divestment is BT’s splitting-off of its wireless operations – a trade sale, IPO, spin-off or equity carve-out? Give reasons for your answer.

(b) Show in summary form the entries BT made in its consolidated accounts to record the divestment of mmO2 and adjustment of mmO2’s net debt on 30 June 2001. Combine operating assets and operating liabilities in one line entry and debt and liquid assets in another. Why doesn’t BT report a gain or loss from its divestment of mmO2?

(c) What was mmO2’s net debt at 30 June 2001 after adjustments?AppenedixLO1

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: