Are the courts correct in limiting the scope of the Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Clause to verbal statements
Question:
Are the courts correct in limiting the scope of the Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Clause to verbal statements so that there is no constitutional protection against compulsory police identification procedures? What would be the implications for law enforcement if the courts included physical evidence like fingerprints or handwriting samples within the scope of the Fifth Amendment privilege?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
The courts have generally interpreted the Fifth Amendments SelfIncrimination Clause to apply primarily to verbal or testimonial evidence rather than to physical evidence like fingerprints or handwriti...View the full answer
Answered By
Joseph Mwaura
I have been teaching college students in various subjects for 9 years now. Besides, I have been tutoring online with several tutoring companies from 2010 to date. The 9 years of experience as a tutor has enabled me to develop multiple tutoring skills and see thousands of students excel in their education and in life after school which gives me much pleasure. I have assisted students in essay writing and in doing academic research and this has helped me be well versed with the various writing styles such as APA, MLA, Chicago/ Turabian, Harvard. I am always ready to handle work at any hour and in any way as students specify. In my tutoring journey, excellence has always been my guiding standard.
1+ Reviews
10+ Question Solved
Related Book For 
Question Posted:
