In 2006 in Hudson v. Michigan, Justice Scalia, writing for a sharply divided Supreme Court, concluded that when it comes to knock-and-announce violations, “[r]esort to the massive remedy of suppressing evidence of guilt is unjustified.” Writing for the four dissenters, Justice Breyer contended that the decision “destroys the strongest legal incentive to comply with the Constitution’s knockand-announce requirement.” Evaluate these opposing views.