Defendant McPherson owned property adjacent to the first Presbyterian Church and wanted to build a gas station on the property. The church sued, arguing that the operation of the station would constitute a nuisance. The lower court found that the unusual noises emanating from the station would interfere with the church's operation to such an extent that it would be a nuisance and therefore granted the permanent injunction. On appeal, do you believe the injunction was upheld? Why or why not? [McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of Woodward et al., 120 Okla. 40; 248 P. 561 (2015).]