Defendant was stopped by police inside the parking garage underneath his apartment building and subsequently arrested for operating while intoxicated. Defendant filed a motion to suppress, arguing that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated because the officers' conduct occurred during a warrantless entry into a constitutionally protected area-the curtilage of his home. The trial court denied the motion to suppress, and the court of appeals affirmed. How do you think the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled and why? [State v. Dumstrey, 2016 WI (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2016).]