Question: Explain why Assumption 3.1 (Full Rank. p. 53) is not necessary for Proposition 3 (Restricted Least Squares). Explain that constraining = Sy+s can be a
Explain why Assumption 3.1
(Full Rank. p. 53) is not necessary for Proposition 3 (Restricted Least Squares). Explain that constraining = Sy+s can be a method of selecting unique fitted coefficients when X is not full rank.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
