In 2016, an editorial in the Wall Street Journal was in favor of, repealing the notorious catfish

Question:

In 2016, an editorial in the Wall Street Journal was in favor of, “repealing the notorious catfish program that has become a byword for Washington waste and protectionism? This should be an easy call.” Why would a federal government program to inspect catfish be considered an example of protectionism? If repealing the program is “an easy call,” as the editorial asserts, why was the program still in place in 2017, more than a year after the editorial was published?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Economics

ISBN: 978-0134738321

7th edition

Authors: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O Brien

Question Posted: