Plaintiff Max Margulis asserts claims against Euro-Pro Operating, LLC for alleged violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and common law fraud. The plaintiff bought a vacuum cleaner system from the de- fendant based on a TV commercial claiming that the product can fit and operate under any bed and comes with a 60-day money back guarantee. The plaintiff found that the vacuum cleaner could not operate under his bed and tried to obtain his money back after returning the product. The defendant continued to charge the plaintiff's credit card, failed to credit his account for the product return, and turned the account over to a collection agency, The plaintiff served an initial set of 154 requests for admission, to which the defendant responded. The plaintiff then filed a second set consisting of 155 requests for admission. The defendant objected and filed a motion for a protective order. What is the outcome?