A Question of Ethics—Identity Theft. Twenty-year-old Davis Omole had earned good grades in high school and played on the football and chess team. He then went on to college.

Omole worked at a cell phone store where he stole customers’

personal information. He used the stolen identities to create a hundred different accounts on eBay and held more than three hundred auctions listing for sale items that he did not own (including cell phones, plasma televisions, and stereos).

From these auctions, he collected $90,000. To avoid getting caught, he continuously closed and opened the eBay accounts, activated and deactivated cell phone and e-mail accounts, and changed mailing addresses and post office boxes. Omole, who had previously been convicted in a state court for Internet fraud, was convicted in a federal district court of identity theft and wire fraud. [United States v. Omole, 523 F.3d 691 (7th Cir. 2008)] (See page 180.)
1. Omole displayed contempt for the court and ridiculed his victims, calling them stupid for having been cheated. What does this behavior suggest about Omole’s ethics?
2. Under federal sentencing guidelines, Omole could have been imprisoned for more than eight years, but he received only three years, two of which were the mandatory sentence for identity theft. Was this sentence too lenient? Explain.