Sherman Act. An agreement that is blatantly and substantially anticompetitive is deemed a per se violation of
Question:
Sherman Act. An agreement that is blatantly and substantially anticompetitive is deemed a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Under what rule is an agreement analyzed if it appears to be anticompetitive but is not a per se violation? In making this analysis, what factors will a court consider? (See page 836.)
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: