Prove the result recalled in Comment 1.4.1.6. If (W_{T}^{(i)}) could be written as (int_{0}^{T} phi_{s}^{(i)} d B_{s})
Question:
Prove the result recalled in Comment 1.4.1.6.
If \(W_{T}^{(i)}\) could be written as \(\int_{0}^{T} \phi_{s}^{(i)} d B_{s}\) for \(i=1,2\), the properties of \(\phi^{(i)}\) would lead to a contradiction.
Comment 1.4.1.6:
A Brownian filtration is large enough to contain a strictly smaller Brownian filtration. On the other hand, if the processes \(W^{(i)}, i=1,2\) are independent real-valued Brownian motions, it is not possible to find a real-valued Brownian motion \(B\) such that \(\sigma\left(B_{s}, s \leq t\right)=\sigma\left(W_{s}^{(1)}, W_{s}^{(2)}, s \leq t\right)\). This will be proved using the predictable representation theorem.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Mathematical Methods For Financial Markets
ISBN: 9781447125242
1st Edition
Authors: Monique Jeanblanc, Marc Yor, Marc Chesney
Question Posted: