Thermal regeneration of a fixed-bed adsorber is based on the fact that the adsorption process is exothermic;
Question:
Thermal regeneration of a fixed-bed adsorber is based on the fact that the adsorption process is exothermic; therefore, heating the saturated adsorbent will result in desorption. The dynamics of the desorption process is very similar to that of adsorption, and can be modeled, for a Langmuir-type isotherm, by the Thomas solution (Vermeulen et al., 1973):
where \(c_{0}{ }^{*}\) is the fluid concentration in equilibrium with the initial adsorbent loading, \(q_{0}\), and \(R=1 /\left(1+K p_{0}{ }^{*}\right)\), where \(p_{0}{ }^{*}\) is the partial pressure corresponding to \(c_{0}{ }^{*}\), and
The fixed-bed adsorber of Example 9.15 will be regenerated using saturated steam at \(373 \mathrm{~K}\) at the rate of \(0.25 \mathrm{~m}^{3} / \mathrm{s}\). The bed will be considered completely regenerated when the acetone content in the exit stream is \(1 \%\) of the gas-phase concentration in equilibrium with the initial solid loading [i.e., \(X(t, Z)=0.01\) ]. At \(373 \mathrm{~K}\), the adsorption equilibrium is described by a Langmuir-type isotherm with \(q_{m}=0.378 \mathrm{~kg}\) acetone \(/ \mathrm{kg}\) carbon, \(K=0.074 \mathrm{kPa}^{-1}\). Calculate the time required for regeneration of the bed.
During thermal regeneration, the gaseous phase is not necessarily a dilute solution of adsorbate in the inert gas. On a mass basis, the adsorbate can even be the most abundant species. The fluid properties required for estimation of the mass-transfer coefficients must be calculated carefully. They should be estimated at a fluid composition that is the arithmetic average of the composition of the fluid at the solid-fluid interface (in equilibrium) and that of the bulk fluid (basically, the inert gas).
Data From Example 9.15:-
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are antibodies produced by hybridoma cells. These cells are clones resulting from cell fusion of lymphocytes (antibody-secreting cells) and myeloma cells (malignant tumor cells) that have the capability of secreting single species of antibodies and can be cultivated. Antibodies are immunoglobins normally produced by the immune system of living organisms to combat the invasion of foreign substances, or antigens.
Over the last few years, commercial interest in MAbs has rapidly increased. They have great potential as therapeutic agents for hematologic malignancies and other diseases. They are also important as affinity ligands for purifying other pharmaceutical substances of importance. Therefore, cost-efficient methods for purifying large quantities of MAbs are important (Montgomery et al., 1998). The biological activity of molecules, such as proteins, cells, and viruses, can easily be destroyed by processing conditions that do not conform to their natural environment. Therefore, traditional separation processes, such as distillation or solvent extraction, are seldom used to isolate them. Affinity adsorption is one of the most effective methods for the direct isolation and purification of biomolecules from complex mixtures (Camperi et al., 2003). It is based on recognition between a pair of molecules determined by the steric structure (three-dimensional arrangement of
its atoms) of the molecules. When molecules have complementary steric structures, they can interact to maximize the hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. Affinity adsorption allows a separation process with high specificity and purity. Camperi et al. (2003) employed affinity adsorption to isolate and purify a monoclonal antibody against GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage–colony stimulating factor) using a peptide affinity ligand attached to agarose (a polysaccharide extracted from agar) in a fixed bed. The adsorbed MAb was recovered quantitatively by elution of the bed with 5 M LiCl. They performed preliminary adsorption equilibrium experiments and found a Langmuir-type isotherm of the form
with q in mg/mL of bed and c in mg/mL of solution. They reported a value of q'm = 9.1mg / mL..
These researchers generated experimental breakthrough curves using a 1.0- mL column packed with the affinity adsorption matrix. The solution containing different feed concentrations of the MAb (0.1, 0.2, and 1.0 mg/mL) was pumped through the bed at a superficial velocity v0 = 0.5 cm/min. The breakthrough results were expressed in terms of the relative MAb concentration in the effluent (Xexp) versus cumulative mass of the MAb (mMAb, mg) applied to the column. Besides the total volume, no further details were given about the column. For computational purposes, we will assume a column length Z = 10 cm, cross-sectional area Ac = 0.1 cm2, and porosity ε = 40%. The breakthrough experimental results for cF = 1.0 mg MAb/mL solution are given in Table 9.3. The cumulative mass of MAb applied to the column can be converted to elapsed time from the relation texp = mMAb/v0AccF. According to the adsorption model with Langmuir isotherm presented in Section equation (9.4.3, the value of the dimensionless time parameter T [see equation (9-63)] must be close to 1.0 for X = 50%. From Table 9.3, texp = 73.6 min for Xexp = 50%. Substituting in equation (9-63) and letting T = 1.0, ρp(1 – ε)q* = 3.28 mg MAb/mL bed. Assuming that the value of qm′ = 9.1mg / mL is accurate, from equation (9-89), K = 0.563 mL/mg. The dynamics of the fixed-bed affinity adsorption process were simulated using equations (9-59) to (9-63). The value of the overall volumetric mass-transfer coefficient Kca was selected by trial and error until a good fit to the experimental
data was achieved. Figure 9.13 shows that excellent agreement between the experimental results of Camperi et al. (2003) and the model predictions was achieved for Kca = 0.024 s–1 using Mathcad. Appendix 9.7 shows the calculations using Python.
Data From Equation 9-59 and 9-63:-
Data From Figure 9.13:-
Data From Appendix 9.7:-
Step by Step Answer: