17.11 Renewable timber economics The calculations in Problem 17.4 assume there is no difference between the decisions
Question:
17.11 Renewable timber economics The calculations in Problem 17.4 assume there is no difference between the decisions to cut a single tree and to manage a woodlot. But managing a woodlot also involves replanting, which should be explicitly modeled. To do so, assume a lot owner is considering planting a single tree at a cost #, harvesting the tree at, planting another, and so forth forever. The discounted stream of profits from this activity is then V=-w+ef(t)-w] + e 21 [f(t) - w] + + e [f(t) - w] + ...
a. Show that the total value of this planned harvesting activity is given by f(t)-w - W.
b. Find the value of t that maximizes V. Show that this value solves the equation f(t) = f (t) + V (t*).
c. Interpret the results of part (b): How do they reflect optimal usage of the "input" time? Why is the value of t* specified in part
(b) different from that in Example 17.2?
d. Suppose tree growth (measured in constant dollars) follows the logistic function f(t)=50/(1+10-0.15). What is the maximum value of the timber available from this tree?
e. If tree growth is characterized by the equation given in part (d), what is the optimal rotation period if=0.05 and w=0? Does this period produce a "maximum sustainable" yield?
f. How would the optimal period change if r fell to 0.04? Note: The equation derived in part
(b) is known in forestry economics as Faustmann's equation.
Step by Step Answer:
Microeconomic Theory Basic Principles And Extensions
ISBN: 9780324585377
10th Edition
Authors: Walter Nicholson, Christopher M. Snyder