A Question of Ethics White Plains Coat & Apron Co. is a New York–based linen rental business. Cintas Corp. is a nationwide business that rents similar products. White Plains had fi ve-year exclusive contracts with some of its customers.

As a result of Cintas’s soliciting of business, dozens of White Plains’

customers breached their contracts and entered into rental agreements with Cintas. White Plains demanded that Cintas stop soliciting White Plains’ customers. Cintas refused. White Plains fi led a suit in a federal district court against Cintas, alleging wrongful interference with existing contracts. Cintas argued that it had no knowledge of any contracts with White Plains and had not induced any breach. The court dismissed the suit, ruling that Cintas had a legitimate interest as a competitor in soliciting business and making a profi t. White Plains appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [White Plains Coat & Apron Co. v. Cintas Corp., 8 N.Y.3d 422, 867 N.E.2d 381 (2007)]

1 What two important policy interests are at odds in wrongful interference cases? When there is an existing contract, which of these interests should be accorded priority?

2 The U.S Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit asked the New York Court of Appeals to answer a question: Is a general interest in soliciting business for profi t a suffi cient defense to a claim of wrongful interference with a contractual relationship? What do you think? Why?

Critical Thinking and Writing Assignments