Do you feel that the DHS inspector general report gives you sufficient and unbiased information on both sides of this argument? Could you make an informed decision based on this report, or do you feel that it would be necessary to read the viewpoints of the tens of thousands of local and state first response agencies that have been affected by this legislation, as well as the emergency management professionals and experts who are not directly associated with the Department of Homeland Security (as was the case with the authors of this report)? Explain your answer.