In our discussion of the dummy variables for schooling levels of table 14.4, we assert that the

Question:

In our discussion of the dummy variables for schooling levels of table 14.4, we assert that the substantive results of a regression are the same, regardless of which dummy variable we omit. Table 14.10 presents the pooled regression of table 14.4 with a single substitution. We include the dummy variable for those with no schooling, but omit that for the few with doctorate degrees.

image text in transcribed

(a) How do the Râ•›2, adjusted Râ•›2, F-statistic, and sum of squared errors in table 14.10 compare to those for the pooled regression of table 14.4? Is this a surprise? Why or why not?

(b) Calculate the predicted value of earnings for a white male, aged 30, with a high school degree using the regression of table 14.10 and the pooled regression of table 14.4. How do these predictions compare?

(c) Calculate the predicted value of earnings for a white male, aged 30, with a college degree using the regression of table 14.10 and the pooled regression of table 14.4. How do these predictions compare?

(d) Calculate the predicted value of earnings for a white male, aged 30, with a professional degree using the regression of table 14.10 and the pooled regression of table 14.4. How do these predictions compare?

(e) Explain why the comparisons of parts

b, c, and d would yield the same results if the predictions were for a woman, or for any of the racial or ethnic minorities, or for an individual of a different age.
(fâ•›) Based on the answers to parts

b, c,

d, and

e, does it matter which educational category we omit from our regression? Why or why not?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: