1. Anderson, a female attorney, was hired as an associate in a large law firm in 1978. She had accepted the position based on the firm’s representations that associates would advance to partnership after five or six years and that being promoted to partner “was a matter of course” for associates who received satisfactory evaluations.

The firm also maintained that promotions were made on a “fair and equal basis.” Anderson consistently received satisfactory evaluations, yet her promotion to partnership was rejected in 1984.

She again was considered and rejected in 1985. The firm’s rules state that an associate passed over for promotion must seek employment elsewhere.

Anderson was therefore terminated by the firm on December 31, 1985. The firm, with more than fifty partners, has never had a female partner.

Anderson filed a complaint alleging gender discrimination against the firm. The firm replied that the selection of partners is not subject to Title VII because it entails a change in status “from employee to employer.”

Does Title VII apply to such partnership selection decisions? Does Anderson’s complaint state a claim under Title VII? See Hishon v. King &

Spaulding [467 U.S. 69 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1984)].