Lock was convicted of operating a vehicle as a habitual traffic violator and had his license suspended. The statute said that individuals with suspended driving privileges could still commute so long as the device they used is designed to have a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour (mph). Lock was subsequently driving his motorized bicycle at 43 mph on a flat surface when apprehended. He challenged his conviction, arguing that his bicycle was not with the statute because it had a maximum designed speed of 25 mph. He argued that the law was unconstitutionally vague and that he did not know his speed was possible until he was pulled over. Is he correct? Why?