Advanced Variance investigation decisions are normally explained in textbooks by simple models, which assume the availability of a significant amount of information.

An example of this approach is:

The managers estimate the probability of any variance being due to a controllable, and there¬ fore correctable, cause at 25%. They estimate the cost of investigating a variance at £1400, and the cost of correcting the cause of a correctable variance at £400. The investigation process is regarded as 100%, reliable in that a correctable cause of the variance will be found if it exists.

Managers estimate the loss due to not investi¬ gating, and hence not discovering, a correctable cause of the variance, averages 75% of the size of the variance. For example, the loss from the failure to discover a correctable £4000 variance would be £3000.

Requirement:

(a) Calculate the minimum size of variance that would justify investigation. (8 marks)

In addition to the approach described above, alternative approaches exist to decide whether to investigate variances by using criteria related to the absolute size of the variance, and criteria based on the percentage from standard.

Requirement:

(b) (i) Explain why these approaches are taken rather than the approach described in

(a) above.

(ii) Comment on the appropriateness of the alternative approaches described above.

(12 marks) (Total 20 marks) CIMA Stage 4 Management Accounting Control Systems