We have already discussed summary parameters for CFC scores for the population of participants in a study
Question:
We have already discussed summary parameters for CFC scores for the population of participants in a study by Adams (2012). The mean CFC score was 3.20, with a standard deviation of 0.70. (Remember that we treated the sample of 800 participants as the entire population.) Imagine that you randomly selected 40 people from this population and had them watch a series of videos on financial planning after graduation. The mean CFC score after watching the video was 3.62.
a. Why would it not make sense to compare the mean of this sample with the distribution of scores? Be sure to discuss the spread of distributions in your answer.
b. In your own words, what would the null hypothesis predict? What would the research hypothesis predict?
c. Using symbolic notation and formulas, what are the appropriate measures of central tendency and variability for the distribution from which this sample comes?
d. Using symbolic notation and the formula, what is the z statistic for this sample mean?
DistributionThe word "distribution" has several meanings in the financial world, most of them pertaining to the payment of assets from a fund, account, or individual security to an investor or beneficiary. Retirement account distributions are among the most...
Step by Step Answer:
Essentials Of Statistics For The Behavioral Sciences
ISBN: 9781464107771
3rd Edition
Authors: Susan A. Nolan